<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>kenjisan: Comments on &quot;For shame, Apple...&quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.kenjisan.com/</link>
    <description>Latest comments for &quot;For shame, Apple...&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 16:09:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on &quot;For shame, Apple...&quot;</title>
      <link>http://www.kenjisan.com/archives/2006/05-26-06.for_shame_apple.html#comments</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Don&#39;t forget the extra $100 in black-matte-protection accessories :). They probably chose matte b/c the shiny plastic would collect fingerprints even more-so and would invite more scratch lawsuits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I actually find the white MacBooks impractical as well. Most other laptop manufacturers will use magnesium or a more scratch-resistant plastic. With a white MacBooks you have to spend money on cutesy stickers to cover up all the scratches or use Brasso on it every couple of months.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://kwc.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;kwc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">comment003564@http://www.kenjisan.com/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 16:09:09 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>